Criminal actions initiated against SEGOES Liquidator’s (Ken Krys & Chris Stride) lawyer and key witness in Uruguay.

Criminal actions initiated against SEGOES Liquidator’s (Ken Krys & Chris Stride) lawyer and key witness in Uruguay.

The Supreme Court of Uruguay unanimously rejected the execution in Uruguayan territory of a sentence of the Court of the Cayman Islands promoted by the liquidators of SEGOES Services Ltd. (Kenneth Krys and Christopher Stride), based on a supposed maneuver of fraud that was alleged but never proven. The Uruguay Supreme Court in a unanimous ruling said that the judgment rendered in the Cayman Islands did not have the guarantees of due process, did not allow the defendant a defense, and did not respect the legality principles of Uruguay. The defendant was not even allowed an appeal in the Cayman Court.

The Supreme Court of Uruguay stated that the minimum norms of international public rights were not fulfilled or honored in the Cayman Islands!

Criminal lawsuits in Uruguay have been filed against Bernard Porras, of Hughes and Hughes and Juan Fischer of LVM Attorneys. (Hughes and Hughes represented the SEGOES liquidator’s in Uruguay on behalf of Ken Krys and Chris Stride).

During and before the Liquidators (Kenneth Krys and Chistopher Stride) losing attempt occurred to effect the judgment of the Cayman Islands in Uruguay, they and their legal representatives engaged in illegal and unethical actions contrary to the laws of Uruguay.

Bernard Porras, of Hughes and Hughes representing the SEGOES Liquidators is now being prosecuted and investigated criminally after illegally attempting to blackmail and extort Juan Fischer- an attorney that represented Laxberg in Uruguay.  Dr. Juan Fischer was blackmailed to alter and coerced to give all of his confidential documentation and the privileged information of his clients to the SEGOES Liquidators, under the threat of which – if he did not comply, he would be prosecuted criminally for participating in a presumed fraud committed by Segoes Services Ltd.

Dr. Fischer confirmed this fact and recently commenced legal actions against the Liquidators and Dr. Porras.  Moreover, a criminal action against Dr. Porras was also recently filed in the Penal Court of 6° turn of Montevideo, with supporting documentation showing proof of the altered documents, extortion and blackmail.  Dr. Fischer is accusing the liquidators, Ken Krys and Chris Stride and their attorney, Dr. Porras of participating in this scheme.

In addition, Dr. Fischer is being prosecuted and investigated criminally for the possible alteration of several emails and for gross violation of attorney client confidentiality and privilege that was in place between Fischer and his clients.   These emails were used by the liquidators in the Cayman Court, even though Fischer, Porras, and the liquidators signed an agreement that these documents would be kept confidential and not enter into any legal proceedings.  

Because of the travesty’s noted above all the judgments obtained in the Cayman Islands clearly contain false and unsubstantiated information provided by the SEGOES Liquidators, Ken Krys and Chris Stride.

After the SEGOES Services Ltd. liquidators and their legal counsel failed in their attempt to validate the Cayman judgments in Uruguay a criminal investigation of fraudulent and possibly malicious acts was commenced, which further explains the rationale why the Supreme Court of Justice of Uruguay in its sentence of the 2nd of October of 2007, rejected unanimously the execution in Uruguayan territory.

Presently, the judge in the criminal lawsuit in addition to the public prosecutor representing the government of Uruguay, ordered the continued investigation of the alleged criminal actions of Ken Krys and Chris Stride in Uruguay. This is in addition to the actions already filed against the liquidator’s lawyers, Bernard Porras of Hughes and Hughes and Juan Fischer.

Ken Krys and Chris Stride are also being sued in Uruguay personally in Civil lawsuits while the possibility of criminal actions remains under investigation.  The civil actions have been filed and are seeking US $10 million to compensate for actual and moral damages that were suffered by the individuals denounced by Ken Krys and Chris Stride before Uruguayan justice.

For more information, please visit http://www.segoes.blogspot.com/

Cayman Courts are unfair and unethical!

SEGOES Liquidators lose unanimous decision in Supreme Court of Uruguay!

Ken Krys and his team of unscrupulous affiliates, RSM Cayman Islands was handed a severe blow in October, 2, 2007 when the Supreme Court of Uruguay after deliberating for almost two years ruled against the enforcement of Cayman Islands legal judgements citing a lack of basic rights and basic legal principles, such as a “right to a defense”!

As difficult as it is too believe, in the Cayman Islands, a trail and judgement can be obtained against another person without that person having a right to a defense. The Uruguay Supreme Court, ruled that a right to a defense is paramount and must exist without conditions.

The Supreme Court stated, “The principles on which (the Cayman Islands) these proceedings are grounded as well as the right of defense are part of the public order in Uruguay constituting a real “ius gentium”. The right of defense establishes that the statements of each party should be produced before the judge and that the verification therof by the judge shall be effective and legal.”

Further, the Supreme Court said, the “Judgement dated Decemeber 2, 2005 was decreed under a Summary Procedure wherein the burden of proof was inverted on the grounds of an assertion of the defendant based on a simple suspicion. Judgement was pronounced on the basis of inferences from the affidavits produced by the liquidators.”

“It must be taken into account that in order to elucidate the matter subexamine the current law of the state of origin of the judgements should be applied, “lex Causae”, as stated by the referred legal provision, which means that the factual assumptions whereto the rule is to be applicable should result sufficiently proved from the proceedings. This is not the case, upon the analysis of the judgements the recognition whereof is sought, neither the issue nor rules applicable are explicit. The Plaintiffs statements are not sufficient who only asserted what should have been proved. Such assertions are not sufficiently supported by the evidence produced in the proceedings.“

Therefore as explained by the Supreme Court of Uruguay, the burden of proof in The Cayman Islands does not exist for the accuser or Plaintiff, (Ken Krys and the SEGOES Liquidators) only for the defendant. Furthermore, a simple right to a defense in Cayman does not exist and was not provided to anyone that the SEGOES liquidators have sued!!!

“The High Court of Justice by unanimous decision of its members, sharing the opinion of the participating Deputy Court Attorney and Court Attorney in Charge, respectively shall dismiss the petition on the grounds that the requirements set forth by C.G.P. Article 539 for the enforcement of foreign judgements in our country have not been complied with.”

Qualifications or observations made of the procedures carried out in the Cayman Islands are not intended to judge the correctness or convenience therof. However, when the enforcement of a foreign judgement is sought, the receiving State, without going to the merit of the case, is entitled to analyze whether certain basic procedural principles, which are an integral part of its own legal structure, have been complied with.

The clear infringements to the due process of law herein referred to prevent the court from accepting the application filed for the enforcement of the judgements thus obtained, constituting violation of international public order within the scope and meaning herein before examined.”

For more information please visit www.segoesblogspot.com

Hello world!

Welcome to WordPress.com. This is your first post. Edit or delete it and start blogging!